From: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [Doc] Improve hostssl related descriptions and option presentation |
Date: | 2025-03-09 11:42:10 |
Message-ID: | CALDaNm2SaumUQBt+ugQTRJ4S7SBzM_7T2+fv3HkMpnr5VFkMGw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 at 00:08, David G. Johnston
<david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 2:20 PM David G. Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Thoughts anyone?
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 3:47 PM David G. Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Motivated by a recent complaint [1] I found the hostssl related material in our docs quite verbose and even repetitive. Some of that is normal since we have both an overview/walk-through section as well as a reference section. But the overview in particular was self-repetitive. Here is a first pass at some improvements. The commit message contains both the intent of the patch and some thoughts/questions still being considered.
>>>
>>> David J.
>>>
>>> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/170672433664.663.11895343120533141715%40wrigleys.postgresql.org
>
>
> Withdrawn as this now has conflicts from recent changes and no one seems interested in voicing an opinion on this for or against.
I've updated the commitfest entry status to "withdrawn." Feel free to
add it again anytime if you change your mind.
Regards,
Vignesh
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2025-03-09 11:44:58 | Re: Considering fractional paths in Append node |
Previous Message | vignesh C | 2025-03-09 11:38:27 | Re: Enhance file_fdw to report processed and skipped tuples in COPY progress |