From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [Doc] Improve hostssl related descriptions and option presentation |
Date: | 2025-02-27 18:37:58 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwZLetR_bdTN2V7at3bX8GJu0xswpKy=LC76W+VCoADy-Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 2:20 PM David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thoughts anyone?
>
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 3:47 PM David G. Johnston <
> david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Motivated by a recent complaint [1] I found the hostssl related material
>> in our docs quite verbose and even repetitive. Some of that is normal
>> since we have both an overview/walk-through section as well as a reference
>> section. But the overview in particular was self-repetitive. Here is a
>> first pass at some improvements. The commit message contains both the
>> intent of the patch and some thoughts/questions still being considered.
>>
>> David J.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/170672433664.663.11895343120533141715%40wrigleys.postgresql.org
>>
>
Withdrawn as this now has conflicts from recent changes and no one seems
interested in voicing an opinion on this for or against.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2025-02-27 18:42:27 | Should work_mem be stable for a prepared statement? |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2025-02-27 18:37:00 | Re: Showing primitive index scan count in EXPLAIN ANALYZE (for skip scan and SAOP scans) |