Re: [16+] subscription can end up in inconsistent state

On Fri, 6 Oct 2023 at 12:26, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 9:50 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
>
> > > 3. Connection string option 'passfile'?
> > >
> > > IIUC the subscription "password_required" option means that the
> > > password must be in the connection string. I'm not sure how the other
> > > connection string "passfile" option [2] fits into this rule. The
> > > current patch looks like it would reject the passfile option (because
> > > IIUC libpqrcv_check_conninfo only looks for "password") -- is it
> > > deliberate? And, should it be documented/commented somewhere?
> > >
> > > ======
> > > src/backend/replication/libpqwalreceiver/libpqwalreceiver.c
> >
> > I felt we should not allow password from the passfile for
> > non-superusers, if password_required is true, the password can be
> > specified only through the password option of the connection string.
> > The same has been documented.
> >
>
> Assuming that everybody is happy with the above decision to only allow
> the 'password' parameter, then your latest v5-0001 patch looked good
> to me.

The patch was not applying on HEAD because of recent commits, the
attached v6 version patch is rebased on top of HEAD.

Regards,
Vignesh