Re: Invalidate the subscription worker in cases where a user loses their superuser status

On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 11:10, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 8:22 AM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
>
> --- a/src/include/catalog/pg_subscription.h
> +++ b/src/include/catalog/pg_subscription.h
> @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ typedef struct Subscription
> * skipped */
> char *name; /* Name of the subscription */
> Oid owner; /* Oid of the subscription owner */
> + bool ownersuperuser; /* Is the subscription owner a superuser? */
> bool enabled; /* Indicates if the subscription is enabled */
> bool binary; /* Indicates if the subscription wants data in
> * binary format */
>
> We normally don't change the exposed structure in back branches as
> that poses a risk of breaking extensions. In this case, if we want, we
> can try to squeeze some padding space or we even can fix it without
> introducing a new member. OTOH, it is already debatable whether to fix
> it in back branches, so we can even commit this patch just in HEAD.

I too feel we can commit this patch only in HEAD.

Regards,
Vignesh