| From: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Enhances pg_createsubscriber documentation for the -d option. |
| Date: | 2025-02-26 11:18:35 |
| Message-ID: | CALDaNm1u1gJKYAADMM6h7OFyhDFdroqR4o3JzP3FGJSGKQLc4g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 at 14:35, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> How about changing it slightly as follows to make it clear: "If
> <option>-d</option>option is not provided, the database name will be
> obtained from <option>-P</option>. If the database name is not
> specified in either the <option>-d</option> option or
> <option>-P</option>, an error will be reported."?
Looks good to me, here is an updated v2 version with the changes.
Regards,
Vignesh
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-0001-Enhances-pg_createsubscriber-documentation-for-th.patch | text/x-patch | 1.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2025-02-26 11:48:47 | Re: Get rid of WALBufMappingLock |
| Previous Message | Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker | 2025-02-26 11:12:16 | Re: pg_trgm comparison bug on cross-architecture replication due to different char implementation |