Re: Enhances pg_createsubscriber documentation for the -d option.

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Enhances pg_createsubscriber documentation for the -d option.
Date: 2025-02-27 08:37:00
Message-ID: CAA4eK1Jtfi7GD3MZ4VVix+Y6Awb_7ZcBjBnnQspJU7XfvzUGtg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 4:48 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 at 14:35, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > How about changing it slightly as follows to make it clear: "If
> > <option>-d</option>option is not provided, the database name will be
> > obtained from <option>-P</option>. If the database name is not
> > specified in either the <option>-d</option> option or
> > <option>-P</option>, an error will be reported."?
>
> Looks good to me, here is an updated v2 version with the changes.
>

Pushed.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2025-02-27 08:52:09 Re: Restrict copying of invalidated replication slots
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2025-02-27 08:36:25 Re: Race condition in replication slot usage introduced by commit f41d846