From: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Disallow UPDATE/DELETE on table with unpublished generated column as REPLICA IDENTITY |
Date: | 2024-11-21 09:55:19 |
Message-ID: | CALDaNm1rycP9+9cDLdAbPDvxq4EiNaTnyiUbGok3O2WkQwZ+gw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 at 19:12, Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 at 14:39, Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
> <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tuesday, November 19, 2024 3:15 PM Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I noticed that we can add 'publish_generated_columns = true' for the case of
> > > generated column. So we won't need to remove the test. I have made the
> > > changes in v9 patch [1].
> >
> > I think this would unexpectedly change the original purpose of that testcase,
> > which is to test the bug mentioned in commit b797def.
> >
> > Basically, I expected the new testcase to fail if we remove the codes fix added in
> > b797def, but the new testcase can pass even after that.
> >
> > If we confirmed that that bug will never be triggered after applying the fix in
> > the thread, it would be better Tt remove that testcase and mention it in the
> > commit message.
> >
> I agree that we can remove the test. I debugged and found the test
> modified in above patch does not hit the condition added in commit
> adedf54.
> Also, according to me we cannot trigger the bug after the fix in this
> thread. So, I think we can remove the testcase.
>
> I have attached the latest patch with an updated commit message and
> also removed the testcase.
Few comments:
1) This seems like a copy paste from
pub_collist_contains_invalid_column, the comments should be updated
according to this function:
+ /*
+ * For a partition, if pubviaroot is true, find the topmost
ancestor that
+ * is published via this publication as we need to use its
column list for
+ * the changes.
+ *
+ * Note that even though the column list used is for an ancestor, the
+ * REPLICA IDENTITY used will be for the actual child table.
+ */
+ if (pubviaroot && relation->rd_rel->relispartition)
2) Here drop index is not required as the drop table will take care of
dropping the index too:
+UPDATE testpub_gencol SET a = 100 WHERE a = 1;
+DROP PUBLICATION pub_gencol;
+DROP INDEX testpub_gencol_idx;
+DROP TABLE testpub_gencol;
+RESET client_min_messages;
Regards,
Vignesh
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2024-11-21 10:41:18 | Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations |
Previous Message | Christoph Berg | 2024-11-21 09:50:52 | Re: 039_end_of_wal: error in "xl_tot_len zero" test |