From: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Added schema level support for publication. |
Date: | 2021-06-22 04:15:04 |
Message-ID: | CALDaNm0s82pbq0MMqAO+TR9gw1MW-UumPvXOn71pUwdsQExPMQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 6:57 AM Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 3:16 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> > I felt this is ok as we specify the keycount to be 1, so only the
> > key[0] will be used. Thoughts?
> > ScanKeyInit(&key[0],
> > Anum_pg_class_relkind,
> > BTEqualStrategyNumber, F_CHAREQ,
> > CharGetDatum(RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE));
> >
> > scan = table_beginscan_catalog(classRel, 1, key);
> >
>
> It maybe fine, just doesn't look correct when you look at the function
> as a whole.
I have added a local variable for this to avoid confusion.
Updated patch has the fix for this, this also includes the fixes for
the other comments you had given.
I have removed the skip table patches to keep the focus on the main
patch, once this patch gets into committable shape, I will focus on
the skip table patch.
Regards,
Vignesh
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v7-0001-Added-schema-level-support-for-publication.patch | text/x-patch | 91.5 KB |
v7-0002-Tests-and-documentation-for-schema-level-support-.patch | text/x-patch | 44.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-06-22 04:37:45 | Re: SSL/TLS instead of SSL in docs |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-06-22 03:53:46 | Re: Different compression methods for FPI |