Re: proposal: possibility to read dumped table's name from file

From: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: possibility to read dumped table's name from file
Date: 2020-09-07 12:14:45
Message-ID: CALAY4q9u30L7oGhbsfY3dPECQ8SrYa8YO=H-xOn5xWUeiEneeg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Pavel

On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 6:22 AM Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

>
> Here is updated patch for pg_dump
>
>
pg_dumpall also has –exclude-database=pattern and –no-comments option
doesn't that qualify it to benefits from this feature? And please add a
test case for this option

regards

Surafel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message gkokolatos 2020-09-07 12:46:50 Re: Strange behavior with polygon and NaN
Previous Message Himanshu Upadhyaya 2020-09-07 12:03:49 Inaccurate comment, for family-1 polymorphic UNKNOWN type arguments