From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: proposal: possibility to read dumped table's name from file |
Date: | 2020-09-11 08:50:01 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRCEBbB3iUqqXsj4wawjHteB2oMHRf1R4wucUzstm=fpkA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi
po 7. 9. 2020 v 14:14 odesílatel Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>
napsal:
> Hi Pavel
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 6:22 AM Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Here is updated patch for pg_dump
>>
>>
> pg_dumpall also has –exclude-database=pattern and –no-comments option
> doesn't that qualify it to benefits from this feature? And please add a
> test case for this option
>
This patch is related to pg_dump (in this moment), so pg_dumpall options
are out of scope.
I am not sure if pg_dumpall needs this functionality - maybe, but I can use
bash or some similar for implementation of this feature. There is no
requirement to do it all necessary work under one transaction, one snapshot.
For pg_dump can be used different format, because it uses different
granularity. Some like "{+/-} dbname"
"--no-comments" is a global parameter without arguments. I don't understand
how this parameter can be related to this feature?
I am working on regress tests.
Regards
Pavel
> regards
>
> Surafel
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2020-09-11 08:57:05 | Re: Implement UNLOGGED clause for COPY FROM |
Previous Message | Peter Smith | 2020-09-11 08:44:13 | Re: Improvements in Copy From |