Re: What is the meaning of pg_restore output?

Hi All, Thanks for your replies.
What about "item" key-word - is it appearing only when -j > 1?

Other phrases "pg_restore: processing *item *3615 DEFAULT id
pg_restore: creating DEFAULT "public.id"
are observed if pg_restore is executed with flag -j N (where N > 1)
and aren't present when -j 1 (or without -j)

2. Are they (output phrases) documented somewhere?

<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 11:32 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> writes:
> > When I restore using 10.2 I see:
> > pg_restore: creating ACL "public.TABLE wl_week"
> > Do you see something similar?
>
> > My suspicion is that this might have something to do with the commits
> below:
>
> Yeah, this evidently changed in commits 3eb9a5e7c et al, which made ACL
> restore go through restore_toc_entry(). I think I figured that the
> "creating ACL" message that restore_toc_entry() would emit made the
> dedicated "setting owner and privileges" message redundant. It had also
> been misleading for quite some time, maybe forever: restore of that TOC
> entry would set the object's privileges all right, but if it ever had
> anything to do with setting the object's ownership, it was a really long
> time ago.
>
> regards, tom lane
>