From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alexandru Lazarev <alexandru(dot)lazarev(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: What is the meaning of pg_restore output? |
Date: | 2018-03-08 21:32:33 |
Message-ID: | 29718.1520544753@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> writes:
> When I restore using 10.2 I see:
> pg_restore: creating ACL "public.TABLE wl_week"
> Do you see something similar?
> My suspicion is that this might have something to do with the commits below:
Yeah, this evidently changed in commits 3eb9a5e7c et al, which made ACL
restore go through restore_toc_entry(). I think I figured that the
"creating ACL" message that restore_toc_entry() would emit made the
dedicated "setting owner and privileges" message redundant. It had also
been misleading for quite some time, maybe forever: restore of that TOC
entry would set the object's privileges all right, but if it ever had
anything to do with setting the object's ownership, it was a really long
time ago.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tiffany Thang | 2018-03-08 21:34:53 | Re: Prefixing schema name |
Previous Message | chris | 2018-03-08 21:30:49 | Re: JDBC connectivity issue |