Re: Any reasons for 'DO' statement not returning result?

If all you want is a temporary function, you *can* create it in the pg_temp
namespace though that seems hackish.

Maybe a better solution would be to extend CREATE FUNCTION in a way that
allows you to CREATE TEMPORARY FUNCTION?

On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Xtra Coder <xtracoder(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Thanks for the link. After looking through it i see following major points:
>
> - thread is from 2013 and nothing changed today in 2016
> - quote from that thread (C) Dimitri Fontaine
> "That topic apparently raises each year and rehash the same points"
> (So ... there should be more similar discussions in previous years,
> i.e. topic was first stated more than 3 years ago)
> - most people agree that DO somehow needs to be made 'RETURNING', but
> there is no consensus how this should be made
>
> And out of that I feel there is no luck with that feature in foreseeable
> future :(.
>
>

--
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

Efficito: Hosted Accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor
lock-in.
http://www.efficito.com/learn_more