Re: CoC [Final]

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj>
wrote:

> On 20 January 2016 at 20:04, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > "which could be considered" is too open-ended. Since this point is
> > the one and only that can cause enforcement to occur, it should be more
> > strict as to what it is that will not be tolerated. I'd propose
> > something like "is widely regarded as harassment" or something like
> > that, so that it needs to be clear that there is a large group of people
> > that considers the behavior unwanted rather than some minority.
>
> The problem with _that_ is that on the internet of 3 billion people "a
> large group of people" can be whipped up from a tiny minority.
>

At the end of the day this will require human judgment rather than
formulation.

Human judgment may be flawed but in a culturally diverse group it is far
better than the alternative.

>
> Geoff
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

--
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

Efficito: Hosted Accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor
lock-in.
http://www.efficito.com/learn_more