From: | Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: CoC [Final] |
Date: | 2016-01-21 10:28:59 |
Message-ID: | CAEzk6feDcTfr9TUA2P_qKFhk5yM2qiTJoPVgkJBwsD2JyE4s6A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 20 January 2016 at 20:04, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> "which could be considered" is too open-ended. Since this point is
> the one and only that can cause enforcement to occur, it should be more
> strict as to what it is that will not be tolerated. I'd propose
> something like "is widely regarded as harassment" or something like
> that, so that it needs to be clear that there is a large group of people
> that considers the behavior unwanted rather than some minority.
The problem with _that_ is that on the internet of 3 billion people "a
large group of people" can be whipped up from a tiny minority.
Geoff
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | (Daniel Stolf) | 2016-01-21 10:34:07 | Re: adding a bdr node using bcv backup |
Previous Message | John R Pierce | 2016-01-21 10:15:01 | Re: Recurring bookings |