Re: CoC [Final]

From: Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: CoC [Final]
Date: 2016-01-21 10:28:59
Message-ID: CAEzk6feDcTfr9TUA2P_qKFhk5yM2qiTJoPVgkJBwsD2JyE4s6A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 20 January 2016 at 20:04, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> "which could be considered" is too open-ended. Since this point is
> the one and only that can cause enforcement to occur, it should be more
> strict as to what it is that will not be tolerated. I'd propose
> something like "is widely regarded as harassment" or something like
> that, so that it needs to be clear that there is a large group of people
> that considers the behavior unwanted rather than some minority.

The problem with _that_ is that on the internet of 3 billion people "a
large group of people" can be whipped up from a tiny minority.

Geoff

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message (Daniel Stolf) 2016-01-21 10:34:07 Re: adding a bdr node using bcv backup
Previous Message John R Pierce 2016-01-21 10:15:01 Re: Recurring bookings