| From: | Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Best way to populate nested composite type from JSON` |
| Date: | 2013-09-13 15:08:43 |
| Message-ID: | CAKt_ZfsBgXTSjNsYsOZd8geMm6H0JKYCZsO64xndNGL+aDfnjA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Yup. As things stand currently, it's better *not* to make
> serialization-driving composite types which when learning the json
> stuff I did heavily; it was a habit I learned (and had to unlearn)
> from libpqtypes which solves a lot of the same problems for C clients.
> You can *almost* send json back to the database with the same
> elegance as it can be sent out of the database. I see a big future
> for postgres-json with many roadmap improvements; it's a complete game
> change for service call driven database interaction and forward
> thinking developers should realize it essentially obsoletes ORMS.
>
> merlin
>
In your view, would it be better to serialize in the pseudo-nested-csv
(native row/array) formats?
--
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
Efficito: Hosted Accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor
lock-in.
http://www.efficito.com/learn_more.shtml
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2013-09-13 15:51:07 | Re: Best way to populate nested composite type from JSON` |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2013-09-13 15:01:17 | Re: e: Running/cumulative count using windows |