Re: Best way to populate nested composite type from JSON`

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Best way to populate nested composite type from JSON`
Date: 2013-09-13 15:51:07
Message-ID: CAHyXU0xB2fN28aG-3deE2fnfAZhtCcWKtvt_M4rsrudK79=Exg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Yup. As things stand currently, it's better *not* to make
>> serialization-driving composite types which when learning the json
>> stuff I did heavily; it was a habit I learned (and had to unlearn)
>> from libpqtypes which solves a lot of the same problems for C clients.
>> You can *almost* send json back to the database with the same
>> elegance as it can be sent out of the database. I see a big future
>> for postgres-json with many roadmap improvements; it's a complete game
>> change for service call driven database interaction and forward
>> thinking developers should realize it essentially obsoletes ORMS.
>
>
>
> In your view, would it be better to serialize in the pseudo-nested-csv
> (native row/array) formats?

What's your client side stack?

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Patrick Dung 2013-09-13 16:17:13 Re: Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL
Previous Message Chris Travers 2013-09-13 15:08:43 Re: Best way to populate nested composite type from JSON`