From: | Scott Mead <scottm(at)openscg(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, "Andrew Dunstan *EXTERN*" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: IDLE in transaction introspection |
Date: | 2011-11-04 18:46:53 |
Message-ID: | CAKq0gvJdRwJXWo-F9uYP-qRc14aq5cB9Wn1HPGW2OpDF4Ys9_Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> >> Maybe there's a better term than "running", like "in progress" or
> >> something of that sort.
> >
> > "active"?
>
> +1.
>
> Letting this one 'poll' a bit more before I post the patch, but here's
what I have:
If waiting == true, then state = WAITING
else
state = appropriate state
I leave the waiting flag in place for posterity. With this in mind, is
the consensus:
RUNNING
or
ACTIVE
--
Scott Mead
OpenSCG http://www.openscg.com
--
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-11-04 19:01:42 | Re: IDLE in transaction introspection |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-11-04 18:31:24 | Re: IDLE in transaction introspection |