Re: IDLE in transaction introspection

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Scott Mead <scottm(at)openscg(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, "Andrew Dunstan *EXTERN*" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: IDLE in transaction introspection
Date: 2011-11-04 19:28:56
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYMVzugS=TjRy5nVf9dYc-J5BtOM86PJr05t4BG4Lr8mg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Scott Mead <scottm(at)openscg(dot)com> wrote:
>    If waiting == true, then state = WAITING
>    else
>      state = appropriate state

No, I think the state and waiting columns should be completely independent.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rodrigo Hjort 2011-11-04 19:35:47 Re: Strange behavior on to_tsquery()
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2011-11-04 19:12:07 Re: heap vacuum & cleanup locks