Thanks Tom
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Yup, sure looks like a bug to me, especially since it seems to work as
> > expected before 9.5. No idea offhand what broke it.
>
> The answer is, I broke it, through some ill-advised neatnik-ism :-(,
> ie clearing a field I thought would be unused but it wasn't.
>
> Fix pushed. Thanks for the report!
>
> regards, tom lane
>