Re: is this a known bug in 9.6?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Torsten Förtsch <tfoertsch123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: is this a known bug in 9.6?
Date: 2016-12-13 18:22:37
Message-ID: 20042.1481653357@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I wrote:
> Yup, sure looks like a bug to me, especially since it seems to work as
> expected before 9.5. No idea offhand what broke it.

The answer is, I broke it, through some ill-advised neatnik-ism :-(,
ie clearing a field I thought would be unused but it wasn't.

Fix pushed. Thanks for the report!

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-12-13 18:35:00 Re: pg_dump and quoted identifiers
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-12-13 18:19:55 Re: CRM where pg is a first class citizen?