Re: Adding support for SSLKEYLOGFILE in the frontend

From: Abhishek Chanda <abhishek(dot)becs(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Adding support for SSLKEYLOGFILE in the frontend
Date: 2025-03-13 23:02:35
Message-ID: CAKiP-K_MZPpLpznyqPVNSy50DtsDBzb+8sQsp1nhbHqZ7zwfLQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thanks, Daniel.

Should there be the ifdef guard in here as well?

+ {"sslkeylogfile", NULL, NULL, NULL,
+ "SSL-Key-Log-File", "", 0, /* sizeof("") = 0 */
+ offsetof(struct pg_conn, sslkeylogfile)},
+

A small nit, this line should say NULL

+ /* line is guaranteed by OpenSSL to be NUL terminated */

Thanks

On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 5:07 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 13 Mar 2025, at 19:31, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >
> > Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> >> Adding the PG prefix to the envvar name addresses my collision
> >> concern, but I think Tom's comment upthread [1] was saying that we
> >> should not provide any envvar at all:
> >
> >>> I think it might be safer if we only accepted it as a connection
> >>> parameter and not via an environment variable.
> >
> >> Is the addition of the PG prefix enough to address that concern too?
> >
> > Indeed, I was advocating for *no* environment variable. The PG prefix
> > does not comfort me.
>
> Attached is a rebased version which fixes the test failure under autoconf (I
> had missed git adding the configure file..) and Windows where the backslashes
> weren't escaped properly. It also removes the environment variable and has
> documentation touchups.
>
> --
> Daniel Gustafsson
>

--
Thanks and regards
Abhishek Chanda

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2025-03-13 23:11:39 Re: Changing the state of data checksums in a running cluster
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2025-03-13 22:31:47 Re: md.c vs elog.c vs smgrreleaseall() in barrier