From: | Kashif Zeeshan <kashif(dot)zeeshan(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ahsan Hadi <ahsan(dot)hadi(at)gmail(dot)com>, Asif Rehman <asifr(dot)rehman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup |
Date: | 2020-04-02 11:54:49 |
Message-ID: | CAKfXphqMjDO+CCiSSPweQnxfAW95kJDbZ4Nwa5uh46HWdrDURQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 4:48 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 7:30 AM Kashif Zeeshan <
> kashif(dot)zeeshan(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> The backup failed with errors "error: could not connect to server: could
>> not look up local user ID 1000: Too many open files" when the
>> max_wal_senders was set to 2000.
>> The errors generated for the workers starting from backup worke=1017.
>>
>
> It wasn't the fact that you set max_wal_senders to 2000. It was the fact
> that you specified 1990 parallel workers. By so doing, you overloaded the
> machine, which is why everything failed. That's to be expected.
>
> Thanks alot Robert,
In this case the backup folder was not being emptied as the backup was
failed, the cleanup should be done in this case too.
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
--
Regards
====================================
Kashif Zeeshan
Lead Quality Assurance Engineer / Manager
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2020-04-02 12:23:27 | Re: adding partitioned tables to publications |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2020-04-02 11:48:33 | Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup |