Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kashif Zeeshan <kashif(dot)zeeshan(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ahsan Hadi <ahsan(dot)hadi(at)gmail(dot)com>, Asif Rehman <asifr(dot)rehman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup
Date: 2020-04-02 13:23:21
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaaUnf=+Z1zF6uu66rRAxaxJWLxjLtCZu8OBWip4x=f7Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 7:55 AM Kashif Zeeshan
<kashif(dot)zeeshan(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks alot Robert,
> In this case the backup folder was not being emptied as the backup was failed, the cleanup should be done in this case too.

Does it fail to clean up the backup folder in all cases where the
backup failed, or just in this case?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2020-04-02 13:25:06 Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-04-02 13:19:28 Re: Resolving the python 2 -> python 3 mess