From: | Dinesh Kumar <dinesh(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | "pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org>, John Foelster <johnfoelster(at)comcast(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: Password setting having somewhat bizarre results. |
Date: | 2013-09-06 18:39:17 |
Message-ID: | CAKWsr7ijFQg8tx+B+naWfDG97E0HaoRxdjrJU8+vucEn7FGPdw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-support |
Hi Dave,
I have setup the mac build for testing this case.
Further to my observation, if we perform the multiple "delete operations"
like 2 to 3 on the same date control, then it's behaving as expected. I
have tried a lot to figure out the cause why it's not raising an Event of
EVT_CALANDER_SEL_CHANGED, EVT_DATE_CHANGED on mac for the single "delete
operation", but unable to find out the reason.
I will work on this parallel and will update you the status very soon.
Thanks for your time.
Dinesh
--
*Dinesh Kumar*
Software Engineer
Ph: +918087463317
Skype ID: dinesh.kumar432
www.enterprisedb.co
<http://www.enterprisedb.com/>m<http://www.enterprisedb.com/>
*
Follow us on Twitter*
@EnterpriseDB
Visit EnterpriseDB for tutorials, webinars,
whitepapers<http://www.enterprisedb.com/resources-community> and
more <http://www.enterprisedb.com/resources-community>
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Dinesh Kumar
> <dinesh(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > H
> > i Dave,
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Dinesh Kumar
> >> <dinesh(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> - Changing the time, but not the date, on an existing expiration
> >>>> datetime, doesn't generate SQL and enable the OK button. Changing
> just the
> >>>> date does.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Apologies Dave. I am not able to explain you the problem properly. But
> >>> below are my findings.
> >>>
> >>> Further to my observation, it's not generating the event of
> >>>
> >>> EVT_SPIN(XRCID("timValidUntil"), dlgRole::OnChangeSpin)
> >>>
> >>> which is in pg_Roles.cpp. If the spin event occurs on spin button, then
> >>> it's directly going to
> >>> "EVT_SPIN_x" in timespin.cpp. And also, i have observed that
> >>> wxTimeSpinCtrl is our custom data type which we have been derived from
> the
> >>> wxControl class. That may be the reason the spin control event is
> directly
> >>> refering to timespin.cpp's EVT_SPIN_x functions. I have fixed this
> issue
> >>> by appending an dlgRole's event to timespin.cpp's event and it is
> working
> >>> fine.
> >>>
> >>> Kindly let me know if anything is unclear.
> >>
> >>
> >> OK, that seems reasonable. Did you check if it breaks any other usage of
> >> that control?
> >>
> >
> > Thanks Dave. I will verify this.
> >
> >> I wonder if, for 1.20, we should think about adding a 3rd party (or
> >> creating a new) datetime control that we can use universally.
> >>
> >
> >
> > Yes true.
> >
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> - If I clear the date and time, SQL is not generated to reset the
> valid
> >>>> until time to infinity.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> If the role's "rolvaliduntil" property is NULL or infinity then there
> is
> >>> no password expiration for that user/role. I believe, in your case the
> >>> "rolvaliduntil" might be the NULL. Hence, it's not generating any
> "VALID
> >>> UNTIL 'infinity'" since, NULL ~ infinity and also we haven't changed
> >>> anything. In the rest of the cases, i believe it will generate as you
> >>> suggested.
> >>>
> >>> Kindly let me know if i miss anything here.
> >>
> >>
> >> Yeah, I think you misunderstood me:
> >>
> >
> >
> >>
> >> 1) Create a new role, and set VALID UNTIL to some value. Close the
> >> dialogue.
> >>
> >> 2) Open the properties dialogue, then clear the date/time fields. That
> >> should cause the dialogue to attempt to set VALID UNTIL to infinity, but
> >> doesn't.
> >>
> >
> > Sorry Dave. :(
> >
> > I am not able to re-produce the above case in windows/Linux. I don't have
> > mac setup to test this. :(
>
> Hmm, OK - it seems it does work on Windows. Well, maybe this is a good
> time for you to setup a Mac build environment :-).
>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Paragon Corporation | 2013-09-07 18:06:37 | Parallel Jobs option feature for backup |
Previous Message | Hager, Paul CIV NAVSEA Crane, NAVSEA | 2013-09-05 17:04:56 | My Emily Litella "never mind" on Linux pgAdmin |