| From: | Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review |
| Date: | 2015-03-02 15:25:03 |
| Message-ID: | CAKRt6CTU-NjVHPoT4YoPp1+GLM7JYCZn+X9EgKk5giL+MRR8SA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro,
I thought I saw a comment about using underscore to separate words in
> privilege names, such as EXCLUSIVE_BACKUP rather than running it all
> together. Was that idea discarded?
>
I'm not sure there was an actual discussion on the topic. Though, at one
point I had proposed it as one of the forms of this attribute. Personally,
I think it is easier to read with the underscore. But, ultimately, I
defaulted to no underscore to remain consistent with the other attributes,
such as CREATEDB and CREATEROLE.
Thanks,
Adam
--
Adam Brightwell - adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com
Database Engineer - www.crunchydatasolutions.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marco Nenciarini | 2015-03-02 15:36:17 | Re: File based Incremental backup v8 |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2015-03-02 15:03:51 | Re: Idea: GSoC - Query Rewrite with Materialized Views |