| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review |
| Date: | 2015-03-01 14:36:59 |
| Message-ID: | 20150301143659.GO2384@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost wrote:
> Thanks! I've gone over this and made quite a few documentation and
> comment updates, but not too much else, so I'm pretty happy with how
> this is coming along. As mentioned elsewhere, this conflicts with the
> GetUserId() to has_privs_of_role() cleanup, but as I anticipate handling
> both this patch and that one, I'll find some way to manage. :)
>
> Updated patch attached. Barring objections, I'll be moving forward with
> this soonish. Would certainly appreciate any additional testing or
> review that you (or anyone!) has time to provide.
I thought I saw a comment about using underscore to separate words in
privilege names, such as EXCLUSIVE_BACKUP rather than running it all
together. Was that idea discarded?
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-03-01 14:37:50 | Re: rm static libraries before rebuilding |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2015-03-01 14:08:29 | Re: Reduce pinning in btree indexes |