From: | Dmitry Shalashov <skaurus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Query became very slow after 9.6 -> 10 upgrade |
Date: | 2017-11-25 11:54:55 |
Message-ID: | CAKPeCUH72oDs4BqkcXYaaGFjygykdifn0xsPF-YPuVuOP1FcaA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
> Excellent, please follow up if you learn anything new.
Sure. But my testing is over and something new might come out only
incidentally now. Testing hasn't reveal anything interesting.
> That will probably be in
> early February, per our release policy:
ok, thanks. That makes me kinda hope for some security problem :)
Is it completely safe to use manually patched version in production?
Dmitry Shalashov, relap.io & surfingbird.ru
2017-11-24 19:39 GMT+03:00 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Dmitry Shalashov <skaurus(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > It looks that patch helps us. Tom, thank you!
> > I'm still testing it though, just in case.
>
> Excellent, please follow up if you learn anything new.
>
> > What are PostgreSQL schedule on releasing fixes like this? Can I expect
> > that it will be in 10.2 and when can I expect 10.2, approximately of
> course?
>
> I haven't pushed it to the git repo yet, but I will shortly, and then
> it will be in the next minor release. That will probably be in
> early February, per our release policy:
> https://www.postgresql.org/developer/roadmap/
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-11-25 12:13:42 | Re: Query became very slow after 9.6 -> 10 upgrade |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-11-25 10:52:42 | Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-11-25 12:13:42 | Re: Query became very slow after 9.6 -> 10 upgrade |
Previous Message | Gábor SZŰCS | 2017-11-25 09:19:59 | Re: insert and query performance on big string table with pg_trgm |