| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dmitry Shalashov <skaurus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Query became very slow after 9.6 -> 10 upgrade |
| Date: | 2017-11-24 16:39:35 |
| Message-ID: | 28356.1511541575@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Dmitry Shalashov <skaurus(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> It looks that patch helps us. Tom, thank you!
> I'm still testing it though, just in case.
Excellent, please follow up if you learn anything new.
> What are PostgreSQL schedule on releasing fixes like this? Can I expect
> that it will be in 10.2 and when can I expect 10.2, approximately of course?
I haven't pushed it to the git repo yet, but I will shortly, and then
it will be in the next minor release. That will probably be in
early February, per our release policy:
https://www.postgresql.org/developer/roadmap/
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2017-11-24 16:53:53 | Re: [HACKERS] proposal - Default namespaces for XPath expressions (PostgreSQL 11) |
| Previous Message | Oliver Ford | 2017-11-24 16:11:10 | Re: Add RANGE with values and exclusions clauses to the Window Functions |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2017-11-25 06:35:22 | Re: insert and query performance on big string table with pg_trgm |
| Previous Message | Dmitry Shalashov | 2017-11-24 15:44:21 | Re: Query became very slow after 9.6 -> 10 upgrade |