Re: [pgAdmin4][RM#3055] Allow user to sort the data in View data mode

From: Murtuza Zabuawala <murtuza(dot)zabuawala(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Robert Eckhardt <reckhardt(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Joao De Almeida Pereira <jdealmeidapereira(at)pivotal(dot)io>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgAdmin4][RM#3055] Allow user to sort the data in View data mode
Date: 2018-04-05 11:29:46
Message-ID: CAKKotZRdfOXX_8osxWHxD=G0mUtmwvdyYa-=RHCkpbOhyOid9g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Hi Dave,

Please find rebased patch.

--
Regards,
Murtuza Zabuawala
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 4:15 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:

> Can you rebase this please?
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 8:19 AM, Murtuza Zabuawala <murtuza.zabuawala@
> enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> Please find updated patch with following changes,
>> - Combined Filter and Data sorting together same as pgAdmin3.
>> - Extracted model into separate file
>> - Change the colour of filter button from orange to blue.
>> - Updated docs and screenshot.
>>
>> @Joao,
>> Could you please provide any reference for learning more about jasmine
>> test framework?
>> ​
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Murtuza Zabuawala
>> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 6:07 AM, Robert Eckhardt <reckhardt(at)pivotal(dot)io>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 9:54 AM, Murtuza Zabuawala <
>>> murtuza(dot)zabuawala(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 7:06 PM, Robert Eckhardt <reckhardt(at)pivotal(dot)io>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 6:25 AM, Murtuza Zabuawala <
>>>>> murtuza(dot)zabuawala(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 3:13 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 9:26 PM, Robert Eckhardt <
>>>>>>> reckhardt(at)pivotal(dot)io> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 2:07 PM, Joao De Almeida Pereira <
>>>>>>>> jdealmeidapereira(at)pivotal(dot)io> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Hackers,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> @Murtuza: The patch codewise looks good. Nice to see that we are
>>>>>>>>> using axios instead of jquery ajax calls and that there is some coverage
>>>>>>>>> for the change.
>>>>>>>>> Nevertheless the Javascript testing looks a bit slim and could be
>>>>>>>>> improved. Also the DataSorting class could have some other member functions
>>>>>>>>> like the model validation could be extracted out so that it is easily
>>>>>>>>> tested.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> @Hackers: This was how we tried to test this feature:
>>>>>>>>> 1 - Started pgAdmin
>>>>>>>>> 2 - Opened the query tool for a specific server
>>>>>>>>> 3 - Executed a SQL statment
>>>>>>>>> 4 - Pressed the column header to try to order, nothing happened
>>>>>>>>> 5 - Right clicked the column header to see if it was there the
>>>>>>>>> option, nothing
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is the behavior that we were expecting, not to have to open
>>>>>>>>> Data View and then press the icon that is not even near the grid in order
>>>>>>>>> to sort the column. Is this really the way we want people to use the grid
>>>>>>>>> in pgAdmin? Should it be more intuitive?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Have we considered making the grid behave more like excel or other
>>>>>>>> grids? I think that having the ascending and descending inside the column
>>>>>>>> header, we could similarly provide filtering. Something that would give
>>>>>>>> users a more intuitive place to look.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Doing the sorting via header clicks is convenient but very
>>>>>>> restrictive. How do you specify multiple columns to sort by for example?
>>>>>>> The current design allows you to select columns and the sort order as you
>>>>>>> see fit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Honestly I'm not sold on my idea, I was just proposing an alternative
>>>>> in an effort to start a discussion about the user experience. Ideally what
>>>>> I'd like to see, maybe this happened, is some user research. When we
>>>>> initial worked on refactoring the results grid we made a bunch of changes.
>>>>> One of the things we intended to do was to follow up to see how people were
>>>>> using the grid now so that we could better understand how it was now being
>>>>> used in order to design and implement features just like this. Clearly we
>>>>> haven't gotten there yet.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Another reason we can't use that because w
>>>>>> e have already occupied that behaviour for selecting entire column
>>>>>> ​ when user clicks on header.
>>>>>> As Dave suggested, I will be merging it with filter dialog meaning it
>>>>>> will be accessible via direct button on toolbar & keyboard shortcut.​
>>>>>> ​
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> How are users currently interacting with that filter dialog?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ​By clicking on the toolbar button as well as keyboard shortcut.
>>>> ​
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry I wasn't clear. My question was more along the lines of, do we
>>> know if people are using the filter functionality? What kind of
>>> filters are people using? What do they like about it? What do they wish
>>> they could do above and beyond sorting, etc.
>>>
>> ​I have not done any data gathering from users so I can't comment on your
>> queries.
>> ​ but a​
>> ​s far as I understood from the feature requests that most of the users
>> expect to have functionality which will allow then to sort columns as it
>> was in pgAdmin3.​
>>
>>
>>
>>> -- Rob
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> What I'm suggesting is that we understand how users want to interact
>>>>> with their results, be those the results of a query or a table view, then
>>>>> we can design something that meets those needs. I agree that changing the
>>>>> column selection behavior isn't desirable, however, I also feel like
>>>>> providing the best user experience is better than holding onto a particular
>>>>> feature implementation.
>>>>> ​
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> -- Rob
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Dave Page
>>>>>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>>>>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
RM_3055_v2.diff application/octet-stream 50.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Murtuza Zabuawala 2018-04-05 12:09:08 Re: [pgAdmin4][RM#3072] Make pgagent job history rows configurable
Previous Message Murtuza Zabuawala 2018-04-05 11:22:39 Re: [pgAdmin4][RM#3072] Make pgagent job history rows configurable