From: | Murtuza Zabuawala <murtuza(dot)zabuawala(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | Harshal Dhumal <harshal(dot)dhumal(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [RM2522] Improve grid/column select all operation |
Date: | 2017-06-30 07:57:55 |
Message-ID: | CAKKotZR_toKwg=ZmFm+gxQb=V0ivBGcfh7JrRgvRt7KVSvKrxw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
I guess so, number of columns do have overhead on selection & copy/paste
operation because of arbitrary copy paste feature, now we have to scan
start cell (first selected cell) & end cell (last selected cell) for each
row, In old code we were selecting complete row which was fast but now user
can select different columns as well, so we have scan for each selected
columns.
--
Regards,
Murtuza Zabuawala
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thursday, June 29, 2017, Harshal Dhumal <harshal(dot)dhumal(at)enterprisedb(dot)
> com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Harshal Dhumal <
>> harshal(dot)dhumal(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Please find attached patch for RM2522.
>>>
>>> With this patch grid/column select all time is reduce to ~1 second from
>>> 8-10 seconds.
>>>
>> This benchmarking is performed with 100k rows and 2 columns (int, text).
>>
>
> I see very little improvement (~15s to 14s). My test case has 108786 rows
> in it, and is generated from the query:
>
> select * from pg_class c, pg_attribute a where c.oid = a.attrelid
> union all
> select * from pg_class c, pg_attribute a where c.oid = a.attrelid
> union all
> select * from pg_class c, pg_attribute a where c.oid = a.attrelid
> union all
> select * from pg_class c, pg_attribute a where c.oid = a.attrelid
>
> Maybe the number of columns has something to do with it?
>
> AND... I'm still left with nothing being copied to the clipboard (the main
> issue by the way, which no patch for this so far seems to have tackled).
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> The solution was to use simple array concatenation instead of underscore
>>> union while getting index of all selected complete rows.
>>> Underscore union function is only useful when user selects different
>>> ranges from grid and those ranges overlaps. In this case union function
>>> removes duplicate (overlapped) rows.
>>> However result grid in sqleditor do not support overlapped row selection
>>> so we can simply cancat rows from different ranges without worrying about
>>> overlapped row selection.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Harshal Dhumal*
>>> *Sr. Software Engineer*
>>>
>>> EnterpriseDB India: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Murtuza Zabuawala | 2017-06-30 08:00:14 | Re: [RM2522] Improve grid/column select all operation |
Previous Message | Ashesh Vashi | 2017-06-30 07:16:19 | Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Declarative partitioning in pgAdmin4 |