| From: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: A small tweak to some comments for PartitionKeyData |
| Date: | 2018-10-25 04:13:43 |
| Message-ID: | CAKJS1f9mTF3yJHe2inW8JzFdWLZNf-_JJCaZY3vnwr6N3ouN8A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 25 October 2018 at 17:05, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> On 2018/10/25 12:54, David Rowley wrote:
>> On 25 October 2018 at 16:46, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>> + * key, one for each zero-valued partattrs */
>>>
>>> How about: for each zero-valued member of partattrs?
>>
>> Aren't arrays made up of elements? I did have "element" on the end,
>> but I didn't think it was worth having the extra line caused by the 80
>> line length limit, so I deleted it.
>>
>> Seems "element" is mentioned 73 times in [1], but "member" does not
>> get a mention.
>>
>> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Array_data_structure
>
> I thought they can be used interchangeably, but perhaps not.
A struct or a class has members.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2018-10-25 04:19:02 | Re: A small tweak to some comments for PartitionKeyData |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2018-10-25 04:05:34 | Re: A small tweak to some comments for PartitionKeyData |