Re: PG11 - Multiple Key Range Partition

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Rares Salcudean <rares(dot)salcudean(at)takeofflabs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG11 - Multiple Key Range Partition
Date: 2019-07-12 07:14:37
Message-ID: CAKJS1f82-6mj+iWD2AhLoHHikp0EwhiZwa5W7xmPBn052H91BQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 at 18:53, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I have looked at the patch. It seems right to make
> match_boolean_partition_clause() return PartClauseMatchStatus instead
> of bool. Didn't find anything to complain about.

Thanks for having a look. I've just pushed roughly that patch with
just some additional comments.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lakradi Marwan 2019-07-12 07:15:46 Re: BUG #15904: ERROR: argument of LIMIT must not contain variables
Previous Message PG Bug reporting form 2019-07-12 06:59:05 BUG #15905: FATAL: the database system is starting up