Re: PG11 - Multiple Key Range Partition

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Rares Salcudean <rares(dot)salcudean(at)takeofflabs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG11 - Multiple Key Range Partition
Date: 2019-07-12 06:53:35
Message-ID: CA+HiwqFr8mucC=m+1Y4k-67tM745m8qckw5XWB6uyMxXdQcuJw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 12:54 PM David Rowley
<david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm about to take a more serious look at the patch I posted a few days ago.

I have looked at the patch. It seems right to make
match_boolean_partition_clause() return PartClauseMatchStatus instead
of bool. Didn't find anything to complain about.

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Bug reporting form 2019-07-12 06:59:05 BUG #15905: FATAL: the database system is starting up
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-07-12 04:23:37 Re: PG11 - Multiple Key Range Partition