Re: Erroneous behavior of primary key

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Daniel J Peacock <bluedanunit(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Erroneous behavior of primary key
Date: 2018-08-27 23:14:26
Message-ID: CAKJS1f-VB3pOF5mE2r6QcrQHAFZ1U8h4razHohb+w+aeSB4ZSg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 28 August 2018 at 07:50, Daniel J Peacock <bluedanunit(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I've got an odd situation with a table that has a varchar(255) as the
> primary key that is getting key values from an Elasticsearch engine. What
> I'm finding is that even though there is a primary key on the table, I am
> getting duplicated keys in the data and the constraint is not blocking
> these.

How do you know they're duplicated?

> When I do a "select <pk_field>,count(*) from <table> group by
> <pk_field> having count(*) > 1" I get no results. Yet, when I search the
> table for a value that is like a key I know to be duplicated, I get multiple
> results. When I select from the table where field is equal to the
> duplicated field I get one result. I verified that they are distinct row
> with ctid. I also created a clone of the table with CTAS and then tried to
> create a unique index on the id varchar field but that failed with
> "duplicate keys found". I'm stumped as to what could be the problem.
> The only thing that I can think of is that the primary key is somehow
> corrupt. I've noticed this behavior on other tables on this database.
> What could be causing this sort of problem?

If the index is corrupt then you might find that:

set enable_indexscan = 0;
set enable_indexonlyscan = 0;
select <pk_field>,count(*) from <table> group by <pk_field> having count(*) > 1;

would return some rows. You should also verify the above query does
use a Seq Scan by performing an EXPLAIN on the query.

There are issues that have been fixed in previous releases which could
have caused an index to get corrupted in this way, so it's quite
useful to know which version of PostgreSQL you're running here and if
you've paid attention to the release notes when you've previously
upgraded. For example, see [1].

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/release-9-6-2.html

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2018-08-27 23:19:28 Re: Will there ever be support for Row Level Security on Materialized Views?
Previous Message Ken Tanzer 2018-08-27 23:06:25 Re: Will there ever be support for Row Level Security on Materialized Views?