| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ken Tanzer <ken(dot)tanzer(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PG-General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Will there ever be support for Row Level Security on Materialized Views? |
| Date: | 2018-08-27 23:19:28 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwYJ1jGEeFyArJoztFAbpeLFoLnj2mViJdN1C3NhzJhxdQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Ken Tanzer <ken(dot)tanzer(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> People on this list generally seem pretty generous in spirit and sharing
> of their knowledge, insights and opinions. It seemed a pretty reasonable
> and typical question to ask. I guess if there's no answer to be had, then
> so be it!
>
You asked the question in a manner where the obvious reactions are: Reply
Affirmative: "Yes, I am planning/working on that right now" or Do Nothing:
"I'm not going to respond because while I'm not aware of any work in this
area I have no clue what others might or might not be planning/doing in
this area before the heat death of the universe (a reasonably close
approximation of "ever")".
Since most things are theoretically possible a flat out - "no that will
never happen is unlikely".
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2018-08-27 23:23:37 | Re: Will there ever be support for Row Level Security on Materialized Views? |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2018-08-27 23:14:26 | Re: Erroneous behavior of primary key |