From: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning |
Date: | 2018-04-07 04:46:42 |
Message-ID: | CAKJS1f-QREiyWqE7fAp6=kKGkm_GtxuO7Aqn9yQZT4xbqKH=Cg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 7 April 2018 at 16:26, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Maybe, PartitionPruneState, because it parallels the
> PartitionPruneInfo that comes from the planner for every partitioned
> table in the tree.
I like that.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Rowley | 2018-04-07 04:58:01 | Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-04-07 04:39:24 | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |