| From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning |
| Date: | 2018-04-07 04:26:51 |
| Message-ID: | CA+HiwqHAKp4=jSQH3WWL4+s3=qWrCaCnBCu-zx4eZ_Tqn6g4DQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 11:26 AM, David Rowley
<david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Everything else looks fine from my point of view.
Me too, although I still think having struct names PartitionPruning
and PartitionRelPruning is going to be a bit confusing. We should
think about naming the latter to something else. I suggested
PartitionPruningDispatch(Data), but David doesn't seem to like it.
Maybe, PartitionPruneState, because it parallels the
PartitionPruneInfo that comes from the planner for every partitioned
table in the tree.
Thanks,
Amit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-04-07 04:31:08 | Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-04-07 04:26:38 | Re: Online enabling of checksums |