| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Ganesh A Hegde <sgurukrupa(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Pg Docs <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: typo in sentence |
| Date: | 2020-08-05 01:03:26 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwbrs_zJsbSMCOWtxL5kF+_+FSCtHeE3eNXaRSd94WznXQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Tuesday, August 4, 2020, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Ganesh A Hegde <sgurukrupa(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > There is only a single sentence starting with 'if' and not two. The
> phrase
> > 'it is therefore ..' is preceded by a comma and not a period. Hence,
> > there's a single sentence and not two as you are referring to.
>
> I concur with Magnus that the "therefore" refers to the sentences
> preceding this one. While we could just drop it as you suggest,
> maybe better is to rearrange:
>
> Therefore, if one PostgreSQL server instance is to house projects or
> users that should be separate and for the most part unaware of each
> other, it is recommended to put them into separate databases.
>
>
I put forth a minor reworking of this page a little while back.
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/29/2647/
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jürgen Purtz | 2020-08-05 11:30:39 | obsolete indexing method "rtree" |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-08-04 21:24:33 | Re: typo in sentence |