From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pól Ua Laoínecháin <linehanp(at)tcd(dot)ie> |
Cc: | "pgsql-novice(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-novice(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Transaction ISOLATION LEVEL - have I missed something? |
Date: | 2021-05-13 18:16:39 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwbr1ycMQjytczn4KBhR85XdjAB-TUBDTANiPKerURL_Aw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
On Thursday, May 13, 2021, Pól Ua Laoínecháin <linehanp(at)tcd(dot)ie> wrote:
> Hi David, and thanks for getting back to me.
>
> >> Am I wrong about this?
> > Transaction isolation levels are immaterial here. The functions define
> what time they return:
>
> Ah, yes, it now makes perfect sense...
>
> All statements in a transaction which is READ COMMITTED sees the data
> as of CLOCK_TIMESTAMP() and all statements in a transaction that is
> SERIALIZABLE see the data as of TRANSACTION_TIMESTAMP().
>
> At least, that's how I understand it now - my error was not
> double-checking my function definitions.
>
No. The isolation level is immaterial to which times are returned. I
welcome being proven wrong but nothing I’ve read in that link suggests
otherwise so I’m disinclined to prove it correct.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pól Ua Laoínecháin | 2021-05-13 20:31:02 | Re: Transaction ISOLATION LEVEL - have I missed something? |
Previous Message | Pól Ua Laoínecháin | 2021-05-13 17:22:30 | Re: Transaction ISOLATION LEVEL - have I missed something? |