Re: nondeterministic collations and statistics and pattern matching

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "morgothko(at)gmail(dot)com" <morgothko(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: nondeterministic collations and statistics and pattern matching
Date: 2020-10-12 00:16:38
Message-ID: CAKFQuwbg30HXHHntgqY2=qjfbqHYNZV4h3OozL3NFjtZtaWJVg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Tuesday, October 6, 2020, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> > If exists statistic with nondeteministic collation inherited from column
> > collation then using pattern matching with collation will give an error.
>
> Yeah, that's a known problem we fixed months ago.
>
> > There is no information about it. ((
>
> Other than the 12.4 release note entry, you mean?
>
> > I have seen this thread
> > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAAFmbbOvfi%3DwMM%
> 3D3qRsPunBSLb8BFREno2oOzSBS%3DmzfLPKABw%40mail.gmail.com
> > But I can't apply this patch for some reasons.
>
> What is your point exactly? You think the documentation should
> describe your unspecified reasons for not updating to 12.4?
> I'm afraid I'm not a telepath.
>

While it doesn’t replace the need for users to look at release notes we are
generally pretty good at concluding patch threads with “applied,
back-patched to vX” comments but didn’t do that here.

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Александр 2020-10-12 08:49:23 Re: nondeterministic collations and statistics and pattern matching
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2020-10-09 15:08:32 Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation