Re: Json table/column design question

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Skorpeo Skorpeo <skorpeo11(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Json table/column design question
Date: 2024-05-23 03:50:47
Message-ID: CAKFQuwbDLizRmcrc5=e5AMdsgZ1DrxBNuvrudcrCdeHaOKDPZw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wednesday, May 22, 2024, Skorpeo Skorpeo <skorpeo11(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if having unrelated columns in a table is a sound approach
> when using json. In other words, if I have two collections of unrelated
> json objects, for example "Users" and "Inventory", would it be ok to have
> one table with a "Users" column and a "Inventory" column? My concern is
> that from a row perspective the columns could be different lengths, such as
> more inventory items as users. And for any given row the data in one
> column would have no relation to another column. I would only query a
> single column at a time.
>
> Would this approach be ok or are there pitfalls such that it would be
> advantageous/recommended to have a separate table for each column?
>
> Any thoughts/inputs are greatly appreciated.
>

What do you expect to gain? The relational model and normalization has
earned its longevity, I suggest you learn and apply those techniques.
Which generally means avoiding json as a data type. (The single table
abomination you describe isn’t even really on the table - you did a fine
job arguing against it yourself.)

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Muhammad Salahuddin Manzoor 2024-05-23 04:01:16 Re: Json table/column design question
Previous Message Skorpeo Skorpeo 2024-05-23 03:38:23 Json table/column design question