Re: Changelog version from 8.1.2 to 9.3.6

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Rakesh Kumar <rakeshkumar464a3(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, "Yogesh Sharma *EXTERN*" <Yogesh1(dot)Sharma(at)nectechnologies(dot)in>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, Moreno Andreo <moreno(dot)andreo(at)evolu-s(dot)it>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Changelog version from 8.1.2 to 9.3.6
Date: 2016-06-15 14:03:35
Message-ID: CAKFQuwaq+G8j=-DtwAWxadRDQqnvgFjuzBzuY_csSgpjL=dX2A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Rakesh Kumar <rakeshkumar464a3(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> > 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 are all Major releases of the PostgreSQL product. For
> > most other products it would as if the numbering went from "15, to 16, to
> > 17". The last 8.x release was 8.4 (so, there were 5 major releases that
> all
> > shared the same prefix value of 8) and the 9.x series goes from 9.0 to
> 9.6
> > (presently in beta). Instead of 9.7 we will be going to 10.0 AND at the
> > same time modernizing our numbering scheme to lose the prefix-suffix
> > components. IOW, after 10.0 the next major release will be 11.0. The .0
> > will increment for minor releases in which we only apply bug-fixes.
> There
> > will no longer be a third number.
>
> Currently are minor upgrades reversible, that is, can we rollback from
> 9.4.3 to 9.4.2.
>

I suspect there may be obscure corner-cases that could trip one up because
this is not done often and not presently tested, at all. But in theory and
as intended, yes.

Minor versions only differ in their binaries. The stored data is
unaffected. Any 9.4.x release should be able to point as a data directory
initialized by any 9.4 binary and operate "correctly".

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan de Visser 2016-06-15 14:17:24 Re: Moving from PHP to Java: A result was returned when none was expected.
Previous Message Melvin Davidson 2016-06-15 14:01:36 Re: random huge delay when recreate a VIEW or FUNCTION