From: | Rakesh Kumar <rakeshkumar464a3(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, "Yogesh Sharma *EXTERN*" <Yogesh1(dot)Sharma(at)nectechnologies(dot)in>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, Moreno Andreo <moreno(dot)andreo(at)evolu-s(dot)it>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Changelog version from 8.1.2 to 9.3.6 |
Date: | 2016-06-15 13:52:19 |
Message-ID: | CAJBB=EVMssGfF3n26Tf+v2r+0MEKdZoQMZRVDiWu+6LP6k0grA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 are all Major releases of the PostgreSQL product. For
> most other products it would as if the numbering went from "15, to 16, to
> 17". The last 8.x release was 8.4 (so, there were 5 major releases that all
> shared the same prefix value of 8) and the 9.x series goes from 9.0 to 9.6
> (presently in beta). Instead of 9.7 we will be going to 10.0 AND at the
> same time modernizing our numbering scheme to lose the prefix-suffix
> components. IOW, after 10.0 the next major release will be 11.0. The .0
> will increment for minor releases in which we only apply bug-fixes. There
> will no longer be a third number.
Currently are minor upgrades reversible, that is, can we rollback from
9.4.3 to 9.4.2.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2016-06-15 13:55:47 | Re: ***SPAM*** Re: random huge delay when recreate a VIEW or FUNCTION |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-06-15 13:47:39 | Re: Changelog version from 8.1.2 to 9.3.6 |