Re: Autovacuum query

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Mitu Verma <mitu(dot)verma(at)ericsson(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Autovacuum query
Date: 2015-03-26 04:31:24
Message-ID: CAKFQuwahxN6fqzRpdvT4y_iBA2CaepkJZyfBOYqq38qXOeFssw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Mitu Verma <mitu(dot)verma(at)ericsson(dot)com> wrote:

> Correcting the subject
>

​And this is why it is considered good form to do "compose new message"
instead of replying to an existing one. Injecting your new topic into an
existing unrelated mail thread is mildly annoying.

David J.
​

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alban Hertroys 2015-03-26 08:08:04 Re: Populating missing dates in postgresql data
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2015-03-26 04:27:25 Re: Populating missing dates in postgresql data