Re: Autovacuum query

From: Jan de Visser <jan(at)de-visser(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Autovacuum query
Date: 2015-03-26 15:14:46
Message-ID: 17646017.CUAzZ6mSYL@bison
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On March 25, 2015 09:31:24 PM David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Mitu Verma <mitu(dot)verma(at)ericsson(dot)com> wrote:
> > Correcting the subject
>
> ​And this is why it is considered good form to do "compose new message"
> instead of replying to an existing one. Injecting your new topic into an
> existing unrelated mail thread is mildly annoying.

Wildly off-topic, but I'm blaming Google. Their thread detection logic is so
good that people actually don't know anymore how it was supposed to work, back
in the bad old days where threads were managed by In-Reply-To headers.

>
> David J.
> ​

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sven Geggus 2015-03-26 15:32:00 9.4+ partial log-shipping possible?
Previous Message Peter Mogensen 2015-03-26 14:36:09 Re: BDR - triggers on receiving node?