| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Atul Kumar <akumar14871(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | o1bigtenor <o1bigtenor(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "svsn2(at)yahoo(dot)com" <svsn2(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Best tools to monitor and fine tune postgres |
| Date: | 2021-01-15 16:36:23 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwadsgXsHaX94Od5SsUh6bzwsu2-WbQrxrdAbt6pM+rhYA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 9:25 AM Atul Kumar <akumar14871(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> You expect everyone to be perfect which cannot happen.
>
> And related to thread, if someone has joined this thread today then it is
> obvious that he may not be able to find the previous threads as well.
>
The quality of a response is pretty highly positively correlated to the
quality of the request. I don't expect people to be perfect, I'm just
describing those things that increase request quality.
"Being able to demonstrate being able to locate existing information" isn't
a prerequisite for receiving a response, but I also don't feel bad when I
don't respond because of the lack, or when my response is to point people
to that already existing information.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2021-01-15 16:42:38 | Re: Best tools to monitor and fine tune postgres |
| Previous Message | Hemil Ruparel | 2021-01-15 16:34:21 | Re: Best tools to monitor and fine tune postgres |