From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Daevor The Devoted <dollien(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Enforce primary key on every table during dev? |
Date: | 2018-03-01 18:52:10 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwaYZnc=g5Jn_CWzXcner-NX3PyK03Xh8rH9nfqs+W55hg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Daevor The Devoted <dollien(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> Could you perhaps elaborate on how a surrogate key allows one to insert
> garbage into the table? I'm afraid I don't quite get what you're saying.
>
A bit contrived but it makes the point:
*Company:*
C1 (id c1)
C2 (id c2)
*Department:*
C1-D1 (id d1)
C1-D2 (id d2)
C2-D1 (id d3)
C2-D2 (id d4)
*Employee:*
C1-E1 (id e1)
C1-E2 (id e2)
C2-E1 (id e3)
C2-E2 (id e4)
*Employee-Department:*
e1-d1
e2-d2
e3-d2
e4-d4
The pair e3-d2 is invalid because e3 belongs to company c2 while d2 belongs
to company c1 - but we've hidden the knowledge of c# behind the surrogate
key and now we can insert garbage into employee-department.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron Johnson | 2018-03-01 19:00:03 | Re: Enforce primary key on every table during dev? |
Previous Message | Francisco Olarte | 2018-03-01 18:40:43 | Re: Enforce primary key on every table during dev? |