| From: | Francisco Olarte <folarte(at)peoplecall(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Steven Lembark <lembark(at)wrkhors(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: Enforce primary key on every table during dev? | 
| Date: | 2018-03-01 18:40:43 | 
| Message-ID: | CA+bJJbw9qNn8Jnzz9Lb9u8g1bQ+5Vg-hcwkiYS5EOUZ+vgb=Dg@mail.gmail.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general | 
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 5:22 PM, Steven Lembark <lembark(at)wrkhors(dot)com> wrote:
> If you can say that "rows containing the same values are not
> duplicates"
Not a native speaker, but "Rows having the same values" seems to me
the definition of duplicate ( ;-), J.K. )
> then you have a database that cannot be queried, audited,
> or managed effectively. The problem is that you cannot identify the
> rows, and thus cannot select related ones, update them (e.g., to
> expire outdated records), or validate the content against any external
> values (e.g., audit POS tapes using the database).
Good point. All the times I've found myself with complete duplicates
allowed I've alwasy found the correct model is no duplicates + count
field ( with possible splits as you pointed below ). I would not have
a "marbles" table with (red, red, blue, white, red, white), I would
switch it to red=3, blue=1, white=2.
Francisco Olarte.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2018-03-01 18:52:10 | Re: Enforce primary key on every table during dev? | 
| Previous Message | Francisco Olarte | 2018-03-01 18:35:17 | Re: Enforce primary key on every table during dev? |