| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Reftel, Bengt Erik Magnus" <Magnus(dot)Reftel(at)skatteetaten(dot)no> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Max size per relation for partitioned tables |
| Date: | 2024-10-23 21:48:18 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwaXxxx_gXPB5qseEbj7a73jf_9cu54WdVdiq1etWUVdJg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wednesday, October 23, 2024, Reftel, Bengt Erik Magnus <
Magnus(dot)Reftel(at)skatteetaten(dot)no> wrote:
>
> Appendix K of the documentation, https://www.postgresql.org/
> docs/current/limits.html , lists 32TB as the maximum size of a relation,
> but it´s not clear to me whether “relation” in this context for a
> partitioned table means the entire logical table, or just the individual
> physical tables it comprises. That distinction is kind of critical for our
> use-case. Does anyone here know which it is?
>
> Each physical partition.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andy Hartman | 2024-10-23 23:59:26 | Re: Backup |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2024-10-23 19:47:01 | Re: Backup |